Mixed Methods


Mixed methods refers to the combinations and comparisons of multiple data sources, data collection and analysis procedures, research methods, and/or inferences that occur at the end of a study.

The reality of many research projects is that they actually contain both qualitative and qualitative data, whether collected intentionally or not. See Dr. Trochim’s website http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/datatype.htm for an explanation of the argument that these two types of data are actually interrelated. As he states,

“…qualitative and quantitative data are intimately related to each other. All quantitative data is based upon qualitative judgments; and all qualitative data can be described and manipulated numerically.”

Mixed Method Research Designs:

  • Use both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis in an effort to capitalize on the above and combine the advantages of both types of data.
  • They also allow a triangulation of evidence and methods that provide a stronger logical case for your conclusions.
Sample Mixed Methods Designs
Type Description
Concurrent Parallel collection and analysis of both qualitative and quantitative data.
Sequential The collection of one type of data provides the basis for the collection of the other.
Qualitized or Quantitized Qualitative data are converted to quantitative data or vice versa.
Conversion After data have been converted, they are analyzed again.

Further Readings:

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

A collection of chapters demonstrating the range of definitions of mixed methods held by different authors and the types of research and analysis strategies.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining the Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Applied Social Research Methods, No. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

A practical guide to mixed methods research including discussions of the underlying philosophical issues, a typology of methods and research issues, and sample studies

Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This book addresses the philosophical issue of whether evaluative methods should be combined when they are believed to have different conflicting assumptions that underlie them. The attempt is to create a basis for mixed methods with a common “analytical space”.


Faculty Spotlight View Other Award Winners

Sandra Wheeler
College of Sciences Sandra Wheeler As an anthropologist and educator, I engage students in the exploration of human difference and understand it as a strength rather than weakness. In the current political climate where human difference is commonly feared and vilified, we need students to think anthropologically and appreciate the complex and diver...

George Bagley
College of Sciences George Bagley If there is a paramount object to teaching, it should be community. Community leads to confidence among my students that the course will be dynamic, will add to their own intellectual growth, while simultaneously ensuring that each point of view will be respected, all assumptions lying at the heart of the complex ...

Vicki Lavendol
College of Rosen Vicki  Lavendol At Rosen College, my goal is to prepare our students to be successful leaders in hospitality. The Rosen College values of professionalism, leadership, and service are the perfect foundation. We build on that foundation each time we lead students in learning. In sharing information, I use a variety of learning ap...