Mixed Methods


Mixed methods refers to the combinations and comparisons of multiple data sources, data collection and analysis procedures, research methods, and/or inferences that occur at the end of a study.

The reality of many research projects is that they actually contain both qualitative and qualitative data, whether collected intentionally or not. See Dr. Trochim’s website http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/datatype.htm for an explanation of the argument that these two types of data are actually interrelated. As he states,

“…qualitative and quantitative data are intimately related to each other. All quantitative data is based upon qualitative judgments; and all qualitative data can be described and manipulated numerically.”

Mixed Method Research Designs:

  • Use both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis in an effort to capitalize on the above and combine the advantages of both types of data.
  • They also allow a triangulation of evidence and methods that provide a stronger logical case for your conclusions.
Sample Mixed Methods Designs
Type Description
Concurrent Parallel collection and analysis of both qualitative and quantitative data.
Sequential The collection of one type of data provides the basis for the collection of the other.
Qualitized or Quantitized Qualitative data are converted to quantitative data or vice versa.
Conversion After data have been converted, they are analyzed again.

Further Readings:

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

A collection of chapters demonstrating the range of definitions of mixed methods held by different authors and the types of research and analysis strategies.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining the Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Applied Social Research Methods, No. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

A practical guide to mixed methods research including discussions of the underlying philosophical issues, a typology of methods and research issues, and sample studies

Greene, J. C., & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This book addresses the philosophical issue of whether evaluative methods should be combined when they are believed to have different conflicting assumptions that underlie them. The attempt is to create a basis for mixed methods with a common “analytical space”.


Faculty Spotlight View Other Award Winners

Honghui Chen
College of Business Administration Honghui  Chen I believe that a professor must create knowledge and effectively disseminate that knowledge to students. I carry my enthusiasm for research excellence to my teaching. I pursue teaching excellence by setting high expectations of students, giving rigorous and up-to-date course material, showing my genuine care about...

Barry Mauer
College of Arts and Sciences Barry   Mauer A university does not just teach salable skills. It should do that, but more importantly it teaches methods that lead to self-knowledge, critical thinking, citizenship--defined in its broadest sense as responsibility for one's locality, state, nation, and globe--and literacy, which is the ability to read and w...

Robert Cassanello
College of Arts and Humanities Robert   Cassanello I teach because I am drawn to the rewards and challenges of teaching. The classroom provides me the opportunity to mentor students, contribute to their intellectual growth, and collaborate with them in the production of original knowledge that shapes the field. I teach courses on state and local history, moder...